Committee advances climate‑related insurance surcharge bill after sharp debate
S.B. 453, proposing a climate-change-related surcharge on certain insurance policies, was reported to the floor after lawmakers split over the funding approach; supporters framed it as a funding mechanism for resilience, opponents called it a regressive fee.
The full story
The committee considered S.B. 453, which would impose a climate-related surcharge (the draft contained a 5% figure) on certain insurance policies to raise funds for climate resilience work. Supporters described infrastructure needs and rising climate risks; opponents argued the surcharge is effectively a tax on consumers and said bonding or other transparent approaches would be preferable.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in