Audit of issues found in draft article
Mar 25, 2026
Checklist of potential problems found by audit and severity.
The full story
spelling: [] clarity: [] chronology: [] framing: [] misinformation:[{"type":"quantitative_precision","description":"The cybersecurity line item was listed in the transcript as $150,000,000; that figure is unusually large relative to other items and presented as aspirational. It should be flagged and verified before publication.","severity":"medium"},{"type":"clarity","description":"Several cost figures (health insurance, pension, support-staff benefit increases) were presented as estimates and not yet approved by governing bodies; the draft stated them but needed clearer 'estimate' labels.","severity":"medium"}] misidentification:[{"type":"speaker_mapping","description":"Several board members were referenced by district (e.g., District 2 member) rather than full names; the draft kept functional labels for those speakers when full names were not explicitly tied to a speaker voice. This is compliant but should be noted.","severity":"low"}] out_of_context: [] Quantitative_precision:[{"type":"unclear_estimates","description":"Multiple numeric amounts are described without source detail in the transcript; article marks them as estimates but further verification is recommended.","severity":"medium"}] Process_clarity: [] Context_clarity: [] Agency_clarity: [] Question_emphasis: [] omission: [] bias: [] duplicate: []
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →