Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Minocqua board approves two land-division proposals, including TA Solberg condominium conversion

Minocqua Board of Supervisors · February 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board approved Preliminary 8500 Place Condominium Plat #03-26 (two-unit conversion for TA Solberg Co.) and a three-lot Plat of Survey #04-26 for Stephen and Nancy Gillen to create two 10-acre parcels for their children; both recommendations came from the Plan Commission.

The Minocqua Board of Supervisors approved two planning items at its Feb. 3 meeting: a preliminary two-unit condominium conversion (Condominium Plat #03-26) submitted for TA Solberg Co., Inc., and a preliminary three-lot Plat of Survey (#04-26) for property owned by Stephen and Nancy Gillen.

Surveyor Jim Rein Sr. of Wilderness Surveying reviewed the Condominium Plat maps and said the filing is intended to reflect condominium ownership for the property identified as Lot 1, CSM 3818 (PIN MI-2167-21), at 8589 & 8593 Dr. Pink Drive. The Plan Commission recommended approval; Supervisor Brian Fricke moved and Supervisor Erika Petersen seconded to accept the recommendation and approve Condominium Plat #03-26, and the motion carried by voice vote.

The board then considered Plat of Survey Map #04-26, a preliminary three-lot map submitted by North Coast Surveying on behalf of Stephen and Nancy Gillen (PINs MI-145 & MI-148). The Gillens are creating two roughly 10-acre parcels for their children and said they intend to use the land for hunting and do not plan to live there. The Plan Commission recommended approval; Supervisor Brian Fricke moved and Supervisor Erika Petersen seconded to accept the recommendation and approve Survey Map #04-26; the voice-vote motion carried.

The meeting record does not include further conditions, engineering contingencies, or permitting timelines for either approval; those details were not specified in the transcript and will appear in plan-commission or permitting files if required.