Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

County road study recommends lower speeds, new signage and a potential three-way stop at key intersections

Gibson County Commissioners · April 7, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Gibson County road study recommended lowering speed limits on narrow County Road 250 South, installing 'children playing' and hidden-driveway signs, considering $5,000 digital radar signs, and converting the County Road 600 South/100 East intersection to a three-way stop to improve vehicle and school-bus safety.

County transportation staff presented a multi-location road study that recommended safety interventions on several rural roadways. The study singled out County Road 250 South (referred to as CTEC) as narrow with a 40 mph limit and suggested reducing the speed to 30–35 mph, adding 'children playing' signs and deploying a digital radar sign to alert motorists. Staff said such radar signs cost about $5,000 apiece and may require solar/battery power at some sites.

At the intersection of County Road 600 South and 100 East, the study recommended converting the intersection to a three-way stop to address frequent stop-sign violations and improve safety for motorists and school buses. Commissioners discussed enforcement options, including targeted patrols during peak Toyota-shift times, and asked highway staff to investigate school-district coordination for bus-stop procedures.

Staff also recommended hidden-driveway signage and additional posted speed-limit signs in populated stretches of County Road 175 East and County Road 850 East; in some locations staff concluded increased enforcement rather than new stop controls would be sufficient. Commissioners asked staff to forward the complete study and digital-sign cost estimates to the auditor for follow-up and possible funding decisions.

Next steps included sending the full study and notes to county administration and reviewing options for lower speed limits and signage; no final regulatory speed-limit changes were made at the meeting.