Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planned‑unit development hearing for 15‑acre multifamily project pulled pending revised site plans

Bartlesville City Planning Commission · February 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff asked the Bartlesville City Planning Commission to withdraw a public hearing for an approximately 15‑acre C‑3 PUD and site-development plan filed by Arlando Parker of AD Parker Development LLC, saying revised documents are not ready; staff expects to re-notice the hearing, likely in April.

The Bartlesville City Planning Commission acknowledged the withdrawal of a public hearing on a planned‑unit development (PUD) and site‑development plan for an approximately 15‑acre C‑3 major multifamily project west of the intersection of Southeast Newport Drive and Southeast Madison, near the 2,500 block of Southeast Washington Boulevard (U.S. Highway 75).

A committee member stated, “So staff is requesting that we withdraw this item,” explaining that changes to the site development plan and PUD documents mean the materials are not ready for a vote. The chair apologized to any members of the public who had attended and said the item had been pulled; the committee member said new public notices will be issued when the project moves forward and staff is predicting a rescheduled hearing in April.

The application was read into the record as filed by Arlando Parker of AD Parker Development LLC. The proposal described in the notice was for a major multifamily PUD on roughly 15 acres under C‑3 zoning; specific project details in the PUD and the site plan were not discussed at length because staff requested withdrawal.

Procedurally, the commission did not vote to approve or deny the PUD at this meeting. Earlier in the agenda the commission unanimously approved the consent agenda to adopt the minutes of the Jan. 27, 2026, regular meeting.

Greg, city planning staff, clarified that if the applicant re‑files the revised proposal the applicant will be required to hold a new citizen‑participation meeting with landowners within a 300‑foot radius of the site and that those meetings are the applicant’s responsibility; city staff will reissue public notices for the new hearing.

Next steps: the applicant is expected to complete revised PUD and site‑development documents, hold the required citizen‑participation meeting, and the city will publish a new public‑hearing notice when the case is ready for commission consideration.