Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Residential Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends annexation and preliminary PUD for Polo Crossing after drainage and traffic questions
Summary
The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended annexation, rezoning and preliminary PUD approval for Polo Crossing, an ~80‑acre mixed residential development totaling about 320 units, after hearing resident concerns about flooding and Wolf's Crossing traffic and detailed stormwater responses from the developer’s engineer.
The Oswego Planning & Zoning Commission voted to recommend annexation and rezoning to R‑3/R‑4 and to recommend approval of the preliminary PUD and subdivision plat for Polo Crossing, a proposed mixed‑residential development of about 80 acres along Wolf’s Crossing.
Developer representatives described a revised plan of about 320 units: roughly 200 attached units (a mix of townhomes, duplexes and triplexes) and 120 single‑family lots, plus a four‑acre public park, a clubhouse and a transmission‑main easement to accommodate Lake Michigan water infrastructure. Carrie Hansen (speaker 15), representing the applicant team, summarized the package and highlighted a 90‑foot right‑of‑way dedication along Wolf’s Crossing and detention basins sized to accommodate future road improvements.
Nearby residents raised significant concerns about historic flooding on adjacent farm and residential properties, stormwater routing and the capacity of West and North drainage paths. Cheryl Todd (speaker 12), whose property backs the proposed north retention area, said flooding has routinely affected her yard and asked how detention would change on the northeast side. Developer civil engineer Chris Lindley (speaker 23) and the petitioner explained the plan for multiple detention basins tied together by culverts, said the design follows village and county stormwater ordinances and asserted the basins will detain and release water at controlled rates to avoid worsening downstream conditions: "Those three detention basins will be tied together, and then the water will go north," Lindley stated.
Commissioners probed phasing, school impacts and whether right‑of‑way dedication and detention would precede road widening. Staff and the applicant explained that the townhome phase is likely to proceed first and that right‑of‑way dedication would be completed through platting and annexation agreements; the project will contribute impact fees and land dedications intended to support Wolf’s Crossing widening. The developer described cash and land contributions to village, park and school districts (the combined cash and right‑of‑way value to the village was described in the presentation as roughly $3.5 million, with total cash equivalents and dedications across affected districts roughly $5.5 million).
After questions and public comment, the commission voted to recommend approval of rezoning upon annexation and recommended approval of the preliminary PUD and plat, while asking staff to ensure that final engineering addresses downstream tile integrity and that detention designs meet village and county standards.
What happens next: The Village Board will consider annexation, rezoning and the PUD recommendation; final engineering, detention design and the timing of right‑of‑way dedication will be refined during subsequent review and annexation agreement negotiations.
