Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board introduces Silver Oak land-use changes and approves a state zoning map amendment over one supervisor's objections
Summary
The board introduced first readings of Bill 107 and Bill 108 to amend the Silver Oak planned-unit development and its development agreement and introduced Bill 109 to rezone two state-owned parcels to public uses; Supervisor White opposed Bill 109, citing incomplete application materials and a preference to reserve rezonings for master-plan updates.
Carson City supervisors took several land-use actions: they introduced first readings of two Silver Oak items and a zoning-map amendment requested by the state.
Staff presented Bill 107, an ordinance to amend the Silver Oak planned-unit development to modify front-yard setback standards for side-loaded garages in phases 25 and 26, creating a 10-foot setback for a side-loaded garage option in certain cluster-housing blocks. Development engineering (Steven Pote) told the board that detention basins in the development were designed to a 25-year standard and that lower density in recent phases reduces runoff concerns. The board introduced Bill 107 on first reading by unanimous vote.
The board also introduced Bill 108, a fifth addendum to the Silver Oak development agreement to modify cluster-housing provisions. No substantive questions were raised; the motion passed unanimously on first reading.
Later the board considered Bill 109, a state-requested zoning-map amendment to change two state-owned parcels in the Capitol Complex from general office (GO) and public-regional to public (P), aligning zoning with the master-plan designation of public/quasi-public. Planning staff said the planning commission made the required findings in the affirmative and recommended approval.
Supervisor White opposed Bill 109 on procedural grounds, arguing the application lacked a proposed use, traffic and infrastructure impact information, and source citations for responses in the application packet; White expressed a broader preference to reserve rezonings for periodic master-plan reviews. City counsel and staff responded that zoning-map amendments consider the full scope of allowed uses in the target zone (not a single contract zoning use) and that creating consistency with the master plan is a legitimate basis for the amendment. The board introduced Bill 109 on first reading by a 4'1 vote, with Supervisor White dissenting.
Next steps: all three ordinances proceed to subsequent hearings/readings per the municipal process.
