Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Fayette County commissioners unanimously approve two rezoning requests

Fayette County Board of Commissioners · February 19, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a special meeting Feb. 19, the Fayette County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved two zoning changes: RZ 25-08 (John Over) converting a North Union Township parcel from B-1 to R-2, and RZ 26-01 (James Bell) converting a Dunbar Township parcel from A-1 to M-1. No public comment was recorded.

The Fayette County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously Feb. 19 to approve two zoning-change requests during a special meeting in the courthouse conference room in Uniontown.

Commissioner Chairman Scott Dunn called the meeting to order at 1:53 p.m., led the room in a silent prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, and opened the floor for public comment. No members of the public spoke on the agenda items.

Commissioner Henry Dutch Kaufman moved to request a change of zone RZ 25-08, for property owned by John Over in North Union Township (parcel 25-06-0120-05), changing the designation from B-1 General Business to R-2 High Density Residential. Commissioner Vince Vicites seconded. Commissioners Dunn, Kaufman and Vicites voted yes and the motion passed unanimously.

On a separate motion, Kaufman moved to request a change of zone RZ 26-01, for property owned by James Bell in Dunbar Township (parcel 09-24-0214 pt), changing the designation from A-1 Agricultural-Rural to M-1 Light Industrial. Vicites seconded; the vote was unanimous in favor.

Following the votes the board recorded no public comment and moved to adjourn. Kaufman made the motion to adjourn, Vicites seconded, and the commissioners voted unanimously to adjourn. The meeting was recorded as ending at 1:55 p.m. and the minutes were attested by the Chief Clerk.

The transcript of the special meeting does not record any discussion of conditions attached to the rezoning requests nor any public testimony; procedural details beyond the motions and unanimous votes were not specified.