Palo Verde proposes four-day high school pilot; board hears student, staff support and questions
Loading...
Summary
Palo Verde High School presented a proposal to pilot a four-day school week (Monday–Thursday plus a Friday for academic support), saying it could boost student well-being, internships and enrollment. Board members asked staff to flesh out metrics, transportation and union-contract implications before any action.
Palo Verde High School asked the Tucson Unified School District Governing Board on April 14 to approve a pilot that would move the campus to a four-day week for the 2026–27 school year, with longer Monday–Thursday periods and Fridays reserved for academic supports, internships and enrichment.
Principal Eric Brock opened the presentation by saying the plan keeps a seven-period day and expands each class to roughly 60 minutes Monday through Thursday so the districts instructional minute count is maintained or increased. "This proposal is a way to attract students," Brock told the board, citing falling enrollment and local competition from charter schools.
Students and staff who spoke in favor described practical benefits. "With an extra day off, I can work on any leftover work from the week," said Analia, a junior at Palo Verde, who urged the board to give the pilot a chance. Counselors and department chairs described using Fridays to target students for tutoring, make-up work and dual-enrollment support. The school shared survey results showing strong parent support (survey excerpts provided to the board showed, in the presenters summary, roughly 87–88% of parents and 72% of students agreeing or strongly agreeing with the idea in sample questions).
Presenters emphasized academic safeguards: the school plans to maintain or slightly increase the districts minute counts (the packet compared current counts to proposed totals and the presenter said minutes would rise from 235 to roughly 240), add an extra math elective to minimize math losses, and use targeted identification (benchmarks, common formatives and vendor tools) to invite students to Friday sessions. Food service and transportation staff were consulted; the school said breakfast and lunch would be available on Fridays and that the bell schedule had been chosen to preserve bus tiers.
Board members did not vote on the pilot at the meeting. They pressed staff on several operational points: how the schedule would interact with union agreements, how bus schedules would accommodate students who need to come in for short tutoring or tests on Fridays, how food service would avoid waste, and how the district would measure success. Dr. Trujillo and school staff said they would continue work with TEA/HR on contract logistics, finalize metrics for course failure rates and credit deficiency, and return with a fleshed-out implementation plan before seeking board action.
Next steps: staff will continue refining financial impacts, compliance with existing agreements and evaluation metrics and return to the board with those details before the district moves from concept to action. No formal approval or timeline for a board vote was set at the April 14 meeting.
