Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Evanston preservation panel continues Asbury Avenue addition, asks for new renderings

Evanston Preservation Commission · April 15, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission continued case 26PRES0019 (Asbury Avenue) and asked the applicant for an oblique three‑quarter rendering and clarification or removal of an eyebrow trim over a flat window; staff will reconvene the item at the May meeting.

The Evanston Preservation Commission continued consideration of a certificate of appropriateness for 26PRES0019 Asbury Avenue after questioning the proposed eyebrow detail and the volumetric representation in the submitted renderings.

John Wilson, the project's architect, presented a proposal to add a single‑story addition to the rear of the house to enlarge and reorient the kitchen. Wilson described materials and detailing he said would match the existing house — including stucco with control joints, painted wood trims and a brick base — and noted the proposed French doors and Marvin Elevate windows.

Commissioners focused their deliberation on an eyebrow trim above a flat‑topped triple window. One commissioner stated, "I would like to see the arch either have arch windows underneath it or just go away." Commissioners said the existing orthogonal elevations and the perspective provided did not make the volumetric relationship between the addition and the gable end clear and asked for a three‑quarter perspective that shows the addition in relation to the house. The architect offered to produce an oblique perspective and a 2‑D section showing awning clearances.

A motion to grant a continuance for case 26PRES0019 (Asbury Ridge Historic District) was made to allow the applicant time to either rework or remove the eyebrow feature and to submit a new three‑dimensional perspective; the motion was seconded and approved by voice. Staff indicated the commission intends to review the revised materials at its May meeting and will confirm the date with the applicant. The continuance preserves the item's status while requiring the applicant to return with clarified drawings.