Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Supporters push Fort Thomas council to rebid skate‑park grant as costs rise; council to update bids and budget
Loading...
Summary
Community members urged Fort Thomas to move forward on a permanent concrete skate park. Council and staff said a state match application tied to $125,000 is pending federal approval and advised rebidding and resubmitting in August to seek higher funding and update cost estimates.
Community advocates urged the Fort Thomas City Council April 20 to press forward on a long‑standing proposal for a concrete skate park, while council and staff said they need updated bids and a clearer funding plan before committing construction funds.
Tommy Main and other supporters described a skate park as an inclusive recreational asset for young people not drawn to organized team sports. "A skate park would be a lifeline for kids who don't play team sports," Tommy told the meeting, describing skate parks as low‑maintenance, durable facilities that can serve generations.
Funding and timeline: Council discussed an application that staff said had state approval for a $125,000 award but still required subsequent federal review. Staff and council members noted the original bids and cost estimates are roughly three years old: an earlier figure of about $250,000–$500,000 was mentioned and speakers said rebidding could yield different prices. Council and staff weighed two options: push to meet an immediate deadline for the existing application or withdraw and reapply during the next cycle (applications open Aug. 1) to pursue a larger match.
Next steps: Council members said they will seek updated quotes, consider placing a line item or resolution on the next meeting agenda to cover a local match, and discuss the item again at finance committee. One councilor said adding a small budget line or resolution that night was possible because the council had previously approved the project concept; staff also offered to assemble updated bid documents and meet with applicants.
Community offers and concerns: Several residents volunteered to help with fundraising and community outreach; youth who testified requested a forum to provide input. Supporters emphasized mitigating noise and safety concerns by building a modern concrete facility rather than metal ramps.

