Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays decision on administrators compensation after debate over evaluation method
Summary
The Board reviewed a new evaluation instrument and a Workshop recommendation for contingent compensation and benefit changes for County Administrator Greg Purcell but failed to table the amendment to Jan. 3; instead the board voted to postpone consideration until Jan. 17 after divided debate over process and actuarial details.
Commissioners discussed the County Administrator/Controllers performance evaluation and a recommended compensation package on Dec. 20. The Administrators Review Workshop introduced a new evaluation tool; after dropping the highest and lowest scores the Workshop reported an average of 58 (equated to a B+). The Workshop recommended $2,500 in contingent compensation, increasing the county contribution to the administrators 457 deferred compensation account from $9,500 to $11,000 annually, and permitting participation in the retiree health insurance credit earlier than previously allowed.
Commissioner Rae presented the Workshops recommendation. Commissioner Moore raised concerns about changes to the evaluation instrument, lack of a 360 review, absence of discussion of goals, and lack of actuarial calculations for benefit changes. Commissioner Bolger asked why any salary/benefit change had to be decided that night; Corporation Counsel Nancy Mullett said there was no legal reason to act immediately.
Commissioner Bolger moved to table amendment of the employment agreement until the Jan. 3, 2008 meeting (Res. 214-2007); that motion was defeated on roll call, Yes 2, No 5. A subsequent motion (Res. 214-A-2007) to postpone consideration until Jan. 17, 2008 carried on roll call, Yes 4, No 3. Commissioners asked for actuarial calculations and more discussion before final action.
