Get email alerts on the Contracts Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislator objects to Hunt Engineers amendment but board approves contract amendment 12-3
Summary
A legislator objected to Amendment No. 3 with Hunt Engineers for NEPA services on a water/wastewater project, citing past unsatisfactory work; the amendment passed on roll call, 12 ayes to 3 no votes.
During consideration of Amendment No. 3 to the county's agreement with Hunt Engineers, an individual legislator voiced a strong objection, saying he would vote no because of prior unsatisfactory performance on a downtown building project.
The objection was explicit: the legislator stated he would "be a no vote on this" and said he was "totally disgusted" with Hunt's work on a past county building, remarks that framed the dissent. The board proceeded to a roll-call vote; recorded votes produced 12 ayes and 3 no's and the amendment was approved.
The exchange was limited to one legislator's public criticism and the formal roll-call tally. No further explanation from county staff about Hunt's contracting history or corrective actions was recorded on the transcript.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
