Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Presentation Formats topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planner Edgar proposes streamlined zoning presentations and condensed staff reports
Summary
Planning staff recommended simpler slides and shorter staff reports so council and the public can more easily understand rezoning requests, proposing maps plus 3–4 bullets, consolidated criteria displays, and executive summaries with attachments for detailed analysis.
Edgar, a planning department staff member, proposed shortening slide decks and staff reports for rezoning and special use permit cases so council and the public can grasp key facts quickly. "An aerial map on one side, 3 or 4 good bullet points on the other," Edgar said, arguing that large blocks of text and tiny fonts undercut the value of an in-person presentation.
The proposal would also consolidate zoning and future land use maps onto a single slide and compress the criteria analysis into one view so council can see at a glance whether the code criteria are met. "That way, as staff is walking you through their analysis and telling you if each one was a complies, partially complies, or does not comply, you'll always have all of them there available, to view," Edgar said.
Council members debated whether the current three-bucket rubric ("complies," "partially complies," "does not comply") helps or hinders decision-making. "That third criteria ... promotes health, safety and general welfare of the city. I mean short of the site being a hazardous material remediation site ... I don't really want to talk about that anymore," said Councilmember Jake (speaker 4), noting that the test can be subjective. Another council member urged giving more narrative context rather than forcing cases into one of three buckets.
Planning staff and some council members said the UDC does not mandate the three-bucket display and recommended giving narrative analysis with a short summary or table up front and placing extensive supporting material in attachments. "Our UDC does require us to look at this criteria, but it doesn't require us to put it into 3 buckets," Edgar said, adding staff could provide a concise paragraph explanation for each criterion and a recommendation summary where useful.
Council also asked staff to make the Planning & Zoning recommendation and district information more visible, and to show the number of public comments attached to each case in the executive summary. Several members suggested a 30–60 second oral summary when P&Z votes are unanimous, to speed routine items while preserving transparency.
The planning department said it will pilot the shorter report and slide formats and return with revised templates. The department also plans to keep long-form criteria analyses as attachments for anyone who wants the full written justification.
