Endangered Species Act overhaul draws sharp partisan split in Rules Committee
Republicans backing HR 1897 said the bill would prioritize species recovery by incentivizing landowner stewardship and streamline permitting; Democrats warned it would "gut" key ESA protections, narrow science standards and make delisting easier — a high‑stakes debate over conservation and land use.
The full story
Representative Hageman, appearing as part of the Natural Resources panel, urged the Rules Committee to report HR 1897, the ESA Amendments Act of 2025, saying the Endangered Species Act has grown into a tool that too often constrains land use without delivering recoveries. Hageman said the bill would "prioritize recovery" by pairing objective incremental recovery goals with regulatory relief and by better aligning federal consultation standards with the effects of agency actions.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in