Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Shared Driveways topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Task force eases shared-driveway restrictions; CID requirement pushed
Summary
The housing task force supported draft changes to allow shared driveways where engineered design and emergency-access conditions are met and endorsed postponing a separate CID requirement (with some members urging legal vetting of HOA/maintenance provisions).
Task-force members reviewed proposed code changes to permit shared driveways in situations that previously required on-street parking nearby and debated how maintenance responsibilities should be assigned.
A task-force member who detailed a project affected by the existing rule described the change: if a shared driveway meets spacing, fire and utility requirements and is designed by a professional engineer, a TEDS exception could allow the driveway even when the adjacent street has no on-street parking. The member said the draft "works pretty good to solve that" and would allow shared driveways in more cases than were previously permitted.
Several members raised legal and operational questions about assigning maintenance authority. One committee member asked whether the draft's requirement that a driveway be assigned to an HOA was appropriate where no HOA exists. Staff said the city’s existing code allows recorded maintenance agreements dedicated to property owners, and legal advice is being sought on whether the recorded maintenance agreement or HOA assignment is preferable.
Staff and task-force members recommended clarifying the code to permit either a recorded maintenance agreement that binds the lots or an HOA assignment where appropriate, rather than forcing HOA formation. The group also discussed how 'additional parking' should be defined for shared-driveway developments and whether recorded site plans or notes can be used to ensure compliance at subdivision.
The task force directed staff to continue legal vetting and return recommended language; members indicated consensus that staff and the project proponent (Ron and staff working together on the project) should be able to resolve most site-specific issues without always returning to the committee.
Next steps: staff will refine shared-driveway language to allow either recorded maintenance agreements or HOA assignment, clarify parking definitions, and report back once legal review is complete.
