Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends rezoning 20.36 acres near 1400 S with conditions after public concerns
Summary
Weber County Planning Commission voted 5–1 to recommend rezoning roughly 20.36 acres at about 3655 W 1400 S from A-1 to R-115 (ZMA 2026-09), subject to conditions including limiting the project to 59 lots, protecting a key irrigation ditch with piping and easements, sewer sized to the county sewer master plan, required road and pathway improvements, and form-based architectural standards.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Weber County Planning Commission voted 5–1 on May 8 to forward a recommendation to the County Commission to rezone about 20.36 acres at roughly 3655 West 1400 South from A-1 to R-115 — a change that would allow more intense residential development — but added a list of conditions intended to protect nearby farms and neighborhood character.
The applicant had requested 68 lots; planning staff and commission discussion focused on whether to permit nine additional lots above the 59 that a 2.9-units-per-acre average would yield. Charlie, the county planner, told commissioners that "the applicant is asking for a total of 68 lots. . . . So he is asking for 9 extra lots," and framed the question as a policy decision for the commission.
The commission’s recommendation keeps the project largely as shown in the applicant’s concept plan but imposes conditions that include: limiting the development to 59 lots unless the County Commission approves otherwise; requiring the irrigation ditch that crosses the property to be piped with recorded easements for maintenance; installing sewer pipes sized to the future sewer-master-plan design (with the option for a pioneer/upsizing agreement to reimburse the developer if upsizing is required); negotiating a park/open-space contribution (a staff estimate of about $7,500 per resident was discussed); requiring street, curb and sidewalk frontage improvements across the project and a temporary packed-path connection to 3500 West until full sidewalk improvements can be completed; dark-sky-compliant outdoor lighting; and architectural styling drawn from the county’s form-based code with build-ready pads for optional garages.
Residents who spoke during the public hearing pressed the commission on infrastructure and character. Emily Rogers, whose family owns property adjacent to the site, urged the commission to protect a "critical irrigation ditch" and "pipe it and there has to be some type of easement so those of us that are still working our land . . . can irrigate when our water shares come up." Other neighbors asked the commission to ensure road widths, sidewalks and sewer planning would prevent tearing up newly placed pavement in the near future and voiced concern about parking for smaller homes.
Commissioners and staff acknowledged those concerns and discussed technical constraints. Charlie said sewer will be a major challenge for the project and recommended that sewer plans and any required upsizing be addressed before final plat approval. Commissioners also discussed development agreements and the county’s ability to ask for agreed improvements where appropriate.
The motion to recommend the rezoning with the listed conditions was made by a commissioner who also drafted a detailed set of development-agreement provisions and passed by a 5–1 vote. The Planning Commission’s action is advisory; the County Commission will review the application, the Planning Commission’s recommendation, and any supporting findings before making the final decision.
Next steps: the Planning Commission will forward the recommendation and staff report to the County Commission; staff indicated the application will return to county review with specific development-agreement language and engineering analyses of sewer and road improvements.

