Georgetown work session spotlights form‑based code and ‘missing middle’ housing options

Georgetown leaders spent part of their March 30 joint work session reviewing planning commission recommendations that call for clearer zoning definitions, modernized procedures and new housing options.

Council member Karen Tingle Sames and Commissioner Kim Minky outlined committee recommendations including an audit of unclear zoning definitions, consideration of a form‑based or hybrid code in targeted areas, development of an inventory of vacant and underused properties, and a standalone city ordinance to distinguish city and county rules.

Commissioners pressed for housing flexibility to address affordability: Kim Minky urged expanding options such as accessory dwelling units, duplexes, townhomes and manufactured houses built on foundations with consistent exterior standards. One speaker suggested exploring tiny‑home clusters and designated sites where smaller, more affordable housing could be concentrated. Several participants also recommended revising sign regulations, adopting design standards for gateways and downtown, and simplifying procedures with plain‑language flowcharts so applicants and the public can better understand the process.

Speakers acknowledged legal and practical constraints — including state statutes that shape local authority — and asked staff to identify barriers and draft options. The Planning and Zoning Commission agreed to review the memorandum at its April 9 meeting and return recommendations to council.

No ordinances were adopted at the session. The joint bodies agreed to prioritize a short list of objectives and to use the proposed steering committee to flesh out ordinance language and implementation steps.