Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rays Stadium Negotiations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board divides over release of Rays stadium negotiation documents; workshop motion approved
Summary
Commissioners sparred over whether to release draft staff analyses and notes tied to Tampa Bay Rays stadium negotiations. A substitute motion to hold a public workshop once an agreement is formulated passed 4-2; opponents sought immediate release of staff documents and financial analyses.
A prolonged, contentious exchange at the April 1 meeting centered on transparency around ongoing negotiations with the Tampa Bay Rays and potential use of Community Investment Tax (CIT) funds.
Commissioner Joshua Wostal pressed for release of draft documents, staff analyses and "personal notes" related to the Rays negotiations, arguing the public and board need transparency before votes. "If this board doesn't want to allow the public to see how we're attempting to spend their money, then shame on us," Wostal said during his motion to compel release by the end of the week.
County Attorney Julia Mandell and County Administrator Bonnie Wise told the dais they had not received draft documents from the Rays and explained legal limits under Florida public-records law, including that staff "personal notes" may be exempt if they were not shared. Mandell said staff would analyze any trade-secret exemption if a party sought it and recommended legal review of documents if produced. Wise said staff had examined potential CIT and tourist-tax funding paths for the proposal but cautioned about negotiating sensitive terms in public.
Commissioner Harry Cohen offered a substitute motion that, instead of forced release, would schedule a televised workshop to present any formulated agreement and supporting analyses once negotiations produced a term sheet; that motion passed 4-2 (Commissioners Wostal and Boles voted no). Cohen framed the substitute as preserving the ability to negotiate while promising a clear public forum once staff and negotiators had a composite proposal. "As soon as there is actually some formulation of agreement ... we schedule a workshop," he said.
Other board discussion stressed the tension between negotiation confidentiality, legal exemptions and the public interest in large taxpayer commitments. The board also separately directed the county attorney to prepare an opinion clarifying permissible use of CIT funds (see separate motion on ballot language).
The substitute motion to schedule a workshop carried; commissioners who opposed it said they would continue to press for immediate disclosure and public hearings before votes.
