Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Born Alive Protections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes born‑alive protections bill amid warnings it may invite litigation
Summary
Senate substitute number 2 for Senate Bill 999, which includes Born‑Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act language and other provisions, passed after floor debate. Several senators warned the bill’s non‑severability clause and added language could create constitutional vulnerabilities and trigger litigation.
Get email alerts on the Born Alive Protections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Missouri Senate voted to pass senate substitute number 2 for Senate Bill 999, a measure that includes the Born‑Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act language plus material incorporated from other bills. Sponsor Senator from Stone said the bill's purpose is to "pass a pro life bill that will stand to protect those that have been born alive," and urged colleagues to support the measure.
Several senators raised objections on constitutional and strategy grounds. Senator from Jefferson said she "reluctantly" would vote no, arguing the bill’s combination of amendments and a non‑severability clause risked throwing out the entire measure and prompting unnecessary litigation that could distract enforcement and litigation resources. Senator from Lawrence similarly said he could not support the conference product, asserting it violated constitutional limits and his oath. Senator from the eleventh described the bill as having been "co‑opted" and said despite supporting the original proposal he could not support the current product because of the legal exposure.
The bill was recorded as passed in the roll call excerpt in the transcript. Sponsor supporters said they had negotiated amendment language and offered the body an up‑or‑down vote on the revised package.
Why it matters: The bill advances criminal and civil protections for infants who survive attempted terminations and other protections for vulnerable persons, but floor objections emphasize the risk that a non‑severability clause (if upheld) could produce broad invalidation in the event courts strike part of the measure.
What’s next: If enrolled and signed, the bill’s provisions could be subject to immediate legal challenge given objections raised on the floor.
