Audit summary and revision notes (internal)

This entry records the editorial audit performed on the draft articles and the follow-up revisions applied before finalization.

What we checked: spelling, clarity, chronology, framing, misidentification risk, out_of_context, quantitative precision, process clarity, context clarity, and omission.

Key findings (and corrections applied): - Chair name inconsistency: Transcript used multiple spellings for the presiding chair (e.g., "Chair Benosinski" and later variants). To avoid misidentification, articles refer to the presiding official as "the chair" for procedural actions and use "Todd Hall, principal planner" for staff references. (Severity: medium.) - Potential transcript misspellings: School name appeared as "Engore High School" in the transcript. The article retains the school reference as described by staff but does not assert a corrected proper name because the transcript spelling could not be verified. (Severity: low.) - Numeric and timeline precision: Several numeric targets mentioned in the transcript (county allocations, long-range unit totals) were summarized qualitatively in the articles; where exact figures were not consistently stated, articles use phrasing such as "not specified" or "large share" to avoid implying precision. (Severity: low.) - Attribution locking: All direct quotes used in articles map to speakers listed in the speaker whitelist; when a statement could not be tied to a single speaker, the text presents the material as unattributed staff explanation or summarizes the discussion. (Severity: low.)

Result: Drafts revised to avoid possible misidentification, to flag ambiguous transcript spellings, and to ensure all quotes are attributable to the speakers captured in the speaker lists. No substantive claims were added or removed beyond clarifying language.