Board presses staff on enrollment drop and whether concurrency payments should be returned to developers
Board members probed staff about a projected decline of roughly 3,355 students next year and a multi‑year drop of about 10,000 students, and asked whether existing concurrency mitigation agreement (CMA) funds collected from earlier contracts should be refunded to developers or redirected when local seats are available.
The full story
During the May 5 work session, board members pressed facilities and planning staff on updated enrollment projections and the use of concurrency mitigation agreement (CMA) funds collected from developers under pre‑2019 contracts.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or