Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Body Worn Cameras topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sheriff's office secures lower-cost refresh for body-worn cameras; support hardware still requires funding
Summary
Mason County sheriff's staff reported that a planned body-worn camera refresh faced equipment supply issues but negotiations reduced the estimated support‑hardware cost from about $70–80K to roughly $19K; the office will seek a budget supplement if grant funding does not cover docking and support systems.
Get email alerts on the Body Worn Cameras topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A sheriff’s lieutenant briefed the commission that Mason County’s five‑year body‑worn camera refresh ran into supplier issues when the vendor said replacement units were not available, forcing renegotiation for coverage. The office had been told the upgrade could cost as much as roughly $70,000–$80,000; after follow-up negotiations the support hardware estimate fell to about $19,000.
The lieutenant said the vendor agreed to refresh the cameras themselves but that the docking stations, chargers and other support pieces may not be covered by pending grant awards. He told the BOCC the sheriff’s office will request a supplemental appropriation in a future budget supplement if grant funds do not cover the support equipment.
Commissioners praised the renegotiation and signaled support for a modest county contribution if necessary. The county’s prior investment in in‑car and body cameras was described as a strong policy decision by commissioners, who said equipment leasing could be considered in future procurement to smooth year‑to‑year costs.
Next steps: The sheriff's office will pursue grant outcomes and present any formal supplement request in a future budget session if grants do not cover docking stations and support hardware.

