Committee debates whether RFQ should seek a master developer or enable phased/multiple developers
Committee members weighed asking for a single master developer against inviting phased or multiple developers in the RFQ, with several members urging clear community priorities (authentic architecture, green space, walkability) and staff saying updated maps and environmental data will be provided to applicants.
The full story
Committee members spent substantial time discussing how the draft RFQ should frame development expectations for Water Street: should the city seek one master developer with a long‑term plan, or allow multiple/phased developers to build smaller projects that create momentum?
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in