Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administrative Hearings topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs option for remote driver’s license revocation hearings

Senate Committees on Transportation; Labor and Technology · March 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate committees on Transportation and Labor & Technology recommended passing HB2097 (HD1), which permits administrative driver's license revocation hearings and evidence exchange via interactive conference technology such as Zoom, following supportive testimony from DOT and the Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office.

Lawmakers on the Senate committees on Transportation and on Labor & Technology recommended passage of HB2097, House Draft One, to allow administrative driver's license revocation hearings and evidence exchanges via interactive conference technology, including teleconference, videoconference, and voice-over-Internet systems.

The bill’s supporters said the change is optional, not mandatory, and reflects current practice. Carrie Harada, Chief Adjudicator at the Administrative Driver's License Revocation Office, told the committee that “Zoom has been used successfully in our office since 2021” and that the platform is “efficient, effective, and saves the judiciary time and money.” Larry Dill of the Department of Transportation also stated his agency’s support and stood on written testimony.

Committee chairs said the measure aligns with a Senate version and had only minor corrections. The chair recommended passing HB2097 with technical and non-substantive amendments; with the chair and vice chair voting aye, the committee adopted the recommendation.

The measure preserves in-person and telephonic hearings while adding interactive conferencing as an alternative. No changes to due-process procedures were proposed during the hearing, and proponents said the technology primarily offers convenience and administrative savings.

The committee record shows the recommendation to pass the measure; next steps depend on the bill’s progression through the Senate calendar.