Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves two conditional‑use permits; comprehensive‑plan amendment fails to advance

Adams County Board of Commissioners · July 9, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On July 9 the board approved two conditional use permits (truck parking and the VIP RV/boat storage CUP) and did not advance a comprehensive‑plan amendment for a commercial pottery/storage site; staff will continue enforcement on prohibited outdoor storage.

Adams County commissioners handled three land‑use matters on July 9, approving two conditional use permits and failing to advance a comprehensive‑plan amendment connected to ongoing storage violations.

1. RCU‑2023/2024/25 (Wert): Staff recommended and the board approved a conditional use permit to allow up to four trucks and trailers to be parked on a ~35‑acre A‑3 property north of Denver International Airport. The applicant, Frank Wert, described shop practices including an asphalted shop floor and oil containment totes; staff required landscape screening and a five‑year permit term. The Planning Commission had recommended approval 6–1 and commissioners approved the permit unanimously.

2. RCU‑20226 (VIP Parking): See separate article for full detail. The board approved the VIP RV/boat storage permit with conditions and a 10‑year term, and staff said compliance will resolve a 2023 violation.

3. PLN‑23‑10 (House of Pots comprehensive plan amendment): Planner Ella Gleon presented a proposal to change a property at 1620 W. 74th Way from Residential Medium to Mixed Use to align with existing C2 zoning. Staff noted longstanding violations for outdoor storage and a settlement agreement requiring removal of unauthorized storage. Commissioners debated traffic, parking feasibility and neighborhood impacts; a motion to approve the amendment was seconded but failed to pass, so the amendment did not move forward. Staff said code enforcement and the county attorney's office would continue pursuing removal of prohibited outdoor storage regardless of the amendment outcome.

The board recessed after completing the land‑use docket and proceeded to a scheduled study session.