Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners table cybersecurity grant request, approve body‑worn camera application
Summary
The court tabled a State and Local Cybersecurity Grant request pending a grant representative, and unanimously authorized submission of a Body‑Worn Camera Grant application for 22 cameras, designating the County Judge as the authorized official and approving required local match commitments.
County Judge Ty Prause and the Colorado County Commissioners on Jan. 26 voted to delay action on a cybersecurity mitigation grant application and to approve a separate application for state funding of body‑worn cameras for law enforcement.
Charles Schneider told the court the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program (SLCGP) funds would be used to “enhance backup solutions and enhance the firewall at the Courthouse, Annex and the Jail,” and noted the grant requires a 30 percent local match. Commissioners said they wanted a technical representative present to answer questions about scope and matching funds; Judge Prause moved to table the item and put it back on the agenda when a representative is available, a motion seconded by Commissioner Ryan Brandt and approved 5–0.
Sheriff Justin Lindemann asked permission to apply for the Office of the Governor’s Body‑Worn Camera Grant Program to buy 22 cameras. The court authorized execution of the resolution and submission of the application and designated the County Judge as the grantee’s authorized official. The record shows the sheriff said a local match would be required; the meeting minutes record the match as “$34,00,” which the court document formatting indicates was intended to be $34,000. The court carried the motion 5–0 (moved by Judge Prause, seconded by Commissioner Keith Neuendorff).
Why it matters: the cybersecurity grant would pay for technical protections affecting courthouse, jail and critical county systems and requires a sizable local match; body‑worn cameras are a visible public‑safety investment that typically hinge on grant awards and local funding commitments.
What’s next: the cybersecurity item will return to the agenda when a grant representative can answer questions about project scope and matching sources. The body‑worn camera application will be submitted to the Office of the Governor; if awarded, the grant and matching plan will return to commissioners for final authorization.
Provenance: This article draws on the court’s Jan. 26 agenda and public minutes where Schneider described the SLCGP proposal and the sheriff described the body‑worn camera request (topic intro: SEG 121; topic finish: SEG 127 for SLCGP; topic intro: SEG 159; topic finish: SEG 165 for body‑worn camera grant).
