Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Incentives topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cook County panel approves bundled tax-incentive requests
Summary
The Business and Economic Development Committee voted to approve a bundled set of three tax-incentive requests from projects listed on the agenda and also approved committee minutes from 04/14/2026. The roll call recorded seven ayes and two absences; no public speakers addressed the committee.
The Business and Economic Development Committee, chaired at the start of the meeting, voted to approve a bundled motion covering three tax-incentive requests and also approved the committee minutes from April 14, 2026.
The chair moved the meeting forward after resolving an initial question about quorum. The committee then approved the minutes from 04/14/2026 by motion and voice/roll call; the chair announced the motion was approved.
The committee considered a bundled motion to approve three tax-incentive requests listed on the agenda. As stated verbally during the meeting, the items were described as: item number "20 six-ten 86," a 6P property tax incentive request for 1300 and N Branch LLC in the City of Chicago; item number "20 six-ten 88," a 6P property tax incentive request for Clear Height Acquisitions in the Village of Broadview; and item number "20 six-ten 89," a 6P property tax incentive request for Common Market Philadelphia in the Village of Bedford Park. Commissioner Sean Morrison moved to approve the bundle; Commissioner Bill Lowry seconded. A roll-call vote recorded seven ayes and two absences, and the chair declared, "The ayes have it and the motion is approved." The agenda item was approved as presented.
No members of the public spoke during the meeting. The committee then adopted a motion to adjourn; the chair closed the meeting after recording no nays.
Agenda item identifiers and the verbal descriptions of the incentive type (spoken as variants of "6P" or garbled on the recording) were taken from the committee’s verbal agenda statements during the meeting; the committee record in the transcript contains variations in spelling and numbering. The transcript did not provide written ordinance or incentive resolutions in full form on the record, and specific financial terms, eligibility conditions, or incentive amounts were not specified during the discussion.
The committee noted remote participation by at least one commissioner and asked staff to address a post-meeting microphone volume issue for a participant.
