Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning Modernization topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning staff and vendor demonstrate prototype to modernize permitting workflow

Klamath County Board of Commissioners Administrative Meeting · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Klamath County planning and public-works staff, with vendor Harmonee, presented a prototype May 19 to streamline application processing by integrating GIS and code-intelligence tools into a unified public- and staff-facing system; the board heard technical and local-control implications but took no formal action.

Klamath County staff and a private vendor demonstrated a prototype May 19 intended to modernize the county Planning Department's permitting and application workflow.

Jeremy Morris, identified in the meeting as representing Public Works and Planning, introduced the presentation alongside Planning staff member Justin Throne and Harmonee representatives Marcio Nunes and Andrew Yagala. They outlined a prototype system designed to streamline application processing by integrating geographic information system (GIS) data, code-intelligence checks, and a single interface for both county staff and the public.

The presenters described the system's goals: speed up review timelines, reduce manual data entry, and surface code inconsistencies earlier in the process. They discussed technical features and options for integration with existing county systems, and emphasized the need to preserve local control over code interpretation and public access.

No formal motion or vote was recorded on the prototype. Commissioners received the presentation and discussed technical integration issues and local-control considerations. The session served as an informational briefing for commissioners to consider further evaluation or procurement steps.

The board did not adopt policy or authorize a purchase during the meeting; any next steps would require separate agenda items and possible procurement review.