Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homeless Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County selects PATH as primary coordinated entry system provider after debate over continuity
Summary
After public pleas to avoid disrupting existing coordinated entry providers, the Orange County Board approved procurement results, selecting PATH as the primary respondent for three CES programs with Friendship Shelter and Orange County United Way named as alternates in case negotiations fail.
The board considered a multi-program procurement to select providers for the county's coordinated entry system (CES) used to prioritize people for housing and homelessness services. Friendship Shelter and Orange County United Way representatives urged the board to avoid destabilizing a functioning system and to consider extending current contracts until the county's CES evaluation concludes.
Nishtha Mahendra of Friendship Shelter asked the supervisors whether a year of transition was the right time to change a provider, noting Friendship Shelter's history in building CES and arguing "a working system should not be destabilized before evidence demonstrates a need for disruption." Sue Parks of Orange County United Way told the board an extension would preserve continuity and protect families during an active evaluation, noting the county had invested about $2,240,000 in family CES infrastructure.
Staff (Doug Beck, director of the Office of Care Coordination) defended the RFP results, saying the RFP was released in February after the expiry of prior renewals and that "our office is comfortable with our ability to go through a transition if a transition results from this solicitation." Beck also explained score differences between respondents (percent-point differences ranging from about 2.6% to 6.7% across program categories) and described the objective solicitation process used by the RFP panel.
Supervisors debated two competing motions: one to maintain current providers for continuity and another to select the top-scoring vendor, PATH, as the primary respondent for programs A, B and C. After discussion and a roll-call, the board approved PATH as the first-choice respondent with named alternates (Friendship Shelter for programs A and C and Orange County United Way for program B) in case negotiations with PATH are unsuccessful. The motion passed with a majority among members present; staff will begin negotiations with the selected respondent and proceed to contract negotiation and execution as appropriate.
The board emphasized the need to avoid service disruptions while also respecting the RFP process and the authority to select a primary respondent followed by negotiation. Staff stated the CES system review will not be finalized until December, and the board chose to proceed with the procurement results while designating alternates to reduce transition risk.
