Process audit: attribution caution and numeric verification recommended
Audit of draft articles flagged one process issue: ambiguous mapping of certain administrator voices to specific named administrators in the transcript; recommended fix: avoid naming administrators unless they self‑identify or are introduced, and verify numeric claims (salaries, fund balances) against staff documents.
The full story
Audit summary: After drafting articles from the May 26 Goshen board workshop transcript, the assistant reviewed the coverage for adherence to attribution and numeric‑precision rules. The draft followed speaker‑attribution policy by using names only where the transcript showed explicit self‑identification or a direct introduction. However, the draft risked implying specific administrative names for speakers who did not self‑identify on the record.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in