Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

After public pushback, council directs competitive RFP for Royal Oak small-area study with public workshops

Titusville City Council · May 26, 2026

Summary

Following public objections to an initial AECOM proposal, council directed staff to issue a competitive RFP for a Royal Oak small-area study that includes public workshops, land-use scenarios and an assessment of stormwater implications; intent is to return proposals for council consideration.

Amid sustained public concern that a previously proposed small-area study lacked technical rigor and meaningful public engagement, the Titusville City Council directed staff to issue a competitive RFP to study the former Royal Oak Golf Course area.

Residents and speakers urged that any study include hydrologic and stormwater analysis, thorough wetland and recharge-area evaluation, and meaningful early public workshops to capture community goals and constraints. One speaker urged hiring teams that combine technical engineering capacity (hydrogeologic and drainage modeling, FEMA/AE flood analysis) with community-engagement skills rather than issuing a narrow task order to an engineering firm.

Council asked staff to ensure the RFP requires: two public workshops (including an early scoping workshop), multiple land-use scenarios, basic stormwater/flow scenario analysis (not a full engineering rebuild but scenario-level implications), and transparent public reporting. The council authorized issuance of a competitive RFP rather than direct award; staff said returning an award recommendation for council consideration could be targeted to the first meeting in July depending on solicitation length.

The motion to move forward with a competitive solicitation passed unanimously. Council set a budget goal of up to $90,000 for the work and asked staff to include both technical and engagement capabilities in the scope.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source