Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rules Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff recommends trimming century-old rules-and-procedures document to avoid duplication with county code
Summary
Staff advised commissioners to excise outdated or duplicated material from the Historic Preservation Commission's rules-and-procedures document and instead rely on Title 40 (Unified Development Code) and adoption-by-reference of standards, with commissioners to review annotated deletions.
Bart (staff) told the commission that much of the existing rules-and-procedures document is duplicated in the county27s Unified Development Code (Title 40) or is outdated and potentially in conflict with current code and practice. He proposed returning commissioners a marked-up version that strikingly shows deletions, identifies where the code already covers the material, and explains why particular sections are proposed for removal.
"Our proposal is that we provide you with a copy of this that is mostly suggested for elimination with notes about why and where it is either in the county code or in conflict," Bart said, arguing that maintaining duplicate language in two places is confusing and a risk for inconsistent practice.
Staff and commissioners discussed the treatment of the Secretary27s Standards (the transcript references "secretary's standards"). Commissioners generally supported adopting current guidance by reference rather than verbatim reproduction, and they stressed the need for a mechanism to monitor material changes to referenced federal standards.
Susan (staff) added that most of the remaining material either appears in Title 40 or is outdated; she said the department will include hot links to authoritative sources so reviewers can verify the most recent versions. Commissioners agreed that striking duplicative text and relying on up-to-date code and reference links would simplify the document and reduce the need for repetitive updates.
Next steps: Staff will prepare a redlined package showing sections proposed for removal, cross-references to the county code (Title 40), and notes explaining where policy is already covered or why a section is obsolete. The commission will review that package and decide whether to approve the excisions or request language to be retained or updated.
