Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utility Rates And Practices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel adopts application requirement, backs refundable $350 deposit for construction utility service
Summary
The Waterloo board voted to require a written application for construction utility service and to use a refundable deposit (discussed as $350) for builders to reduce unpaid utility bills on long-build projects; members debated whether repeat builders should be exempt after good standing.
A staff member told the Waterloo Utility Board that the proposed ordinance language would require written applications for construction utility service (electric, water, gas, sewer) and make a refundable deposit part of the process for builders and contractors. "The application I think is the easiest thing," the staff member said, describing the current practice where building permits were sometimes used to start utility service without a formal application.
Board members described past instances where small builders had not paid final utility bills when projects took a long time; staff estimated uncollectible amounts from the past year and a half at "a little over 3,000." The board discussed whether to require a $350 deposit for each new builder account or to allow repeat builders with good standing to proceed without repeated deposits. "So it's one of the first time they're pulling utilities," a committee member said in favor of matching the deposit to how resident accounts are handled.
Members moved to record the decision to require the application and deposit in committee minutes and voted in favor; the transcript does not list a detailed vote tally. The board instructed staff to implement the application and deposit process, correct form language as needed, and return further clarification if attorneys find jurisdictional or procedural issues.
Next steps include staff refining the application language, confirming the $350 deposit mechanics (how and when it is refunded or applied to final bills), and seeking attorney review for formal ordinance language.
