Internal audit log for produced articles

Audit summary (categories below indicate whether issues were found and how they were fixed).

spelling: [] clarity: [] chronology: [] framing: [] misinformation: [] misidentification: [{"type":"minor","description":"Several speakers were not named in the transcript; the assistant used role labels (Chair, Staff member, Agency official) following the speaker-attribution rules rather than inferring full names.","severity":"low"}] out_of_context: [] Quantitative precision: [{"type":"clarification","description":"Where only approximate or aggregated budget totals were mentioned verbally (e.g., some consolidated bottom-line sums), the article used the phrasing 'proposed' or 'approximately' and included exact reported bottoms where the transcript provided them. When a number was not specified in the transcript the article marks it as not specified or used the figure directly quoted in the meeting.","severity":"low"}] Process clarity: [] Context clarity: [] Agency clarity: [] Question emphasis: [] omission: [] bias: [] duplicate: []

Fixes applied in revision: ensured speakers are only named when explicitly introduced or self-identified; used role labels elsewhere; kept quotes strictly tied to transcript excerpts; flagged estimated figures and used recorded bottom-line totals for votes and motions; included provenance segments for key claims and actions; added a short "Votes at a glance" list to ensure formal actions were captured.

If any editor requires changes to speaker labels (for example, providing a full name if the editor has access to meeting metadata), update the speakers lists and body attributions accordingly.