Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Bylaws Remote Participation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel clarifies remote participation rules as bylaws updated

Goochland County Design Review Committee · May 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During its May 29 meeting the Goochland County Design Review Committee discussed article 4.2.1 of its bylaws about remote participation and quorum, and the deputy county attorney explained that Virginia Code provisions allow electronic participation to count toward quorum only under definitions for disability or caregiver status; the committee approved the bylaw amendments.

A committee member raised a question about the committee’s remote participation policy (article 4.2.1) at the May 29 meeting of the Goochland County Design Review Committee, asking whether the bylaw allowed a member participating remotely for a personal matter to count toward quorum.

"When I read through the remote participation policy... it appears to say that there's only a quorum if one of the members is participating remotely because they either have a disability or are a caregiver," the committee member said, asking whether the text should be read more broadly to include personal matters.

Alexandra Spalding, deputy county attorney, told the committee that recent changes to the Virginia Code permit electronic participation in limited circumstances and explained how that interacts with the committee’s small, three-member structure. "The Virginia code changed this to allow for a person to be out for this reason and still count for quorum," she said, adding that the committee generally must have two members physically present and that only one member may participate electronically in most situations.

Spalding said the committee’s bylaws provide the chair with authority to allow a member to participate remotely for a personal matter, but that the chair’s decision can be appealed by the other members. She offered to research and provide a precise statutory citation if the committee wanted further confirmation.

Following the discussion, the committee moved to approve the proposed amendments to the bylaws; the motion was seconded and the chair declared the motion carried.

The exchange clarified that, under current practice as explained by counsel, remote participation counts toward quorum primarily when it falls within the statutory definitions (disability or caregiver); in other cases the chair may permit participation on a case-by-case basis, subject to appeal. Members also noted practical mitigation options — moving a meeting or using an alternate — if quorum is in jeopardy.

The committee approved the amendments and then moved on to approve the minutes and adjourn.

Attribution: direct statements are taken from the meeting transcript. The deputy county attorney introduced herself in the record as "Alexandra Spalding" but the transcript contains inconsistent spellings of her surname elsewhere ("Spaulding").