Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mill Building topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission flags outdated RAM report, questions developer claim that Mill Building work will 'clean' underground plume
Summary
The commission learned that the Conservation Commission postponed Mill Building review to May 4 and requested updated information because the RAM report appears outdated; members questioned a developer assertion that site work would improve an underlying contamination plume and agreed to check whether a demolition delay applies.
Ashland Historical Commission members on April 14 discussed outstanding technical and procedural questions about a proposed Mill Building project. Joan Gonfrade reported the Conservation Commission postponed its review until May 4 and asked for updated documentation because the RAM report on file appears outdated.
During discussion Curtiss Hoffman asked about a developer claim that proposed site work would improve a subsurface contamination plume. Gonfrade summarized the developer’s assertion that the area "would be cleaner than it is now," but said she did not know what that meant in technical terms. Commissioners expressed concern the developer may pursue the least-expensive, fastest remediation methods and agreed to stay engaged to ensure adequate environmental review.
Members also debated whether the project still requires a demolition delay (DD), noting the developer appears to believe it is exempt. Chair Jim Neilsen said the commission would research whether the DD is required for the site and follow up with the Conservation Commission and town counsel as needed.
The Conservation Commission’s request for updated information and the commission’s plan to monitor remediation and DD compliance are the next steps before any further action.
