Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landscaping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LDRC advances landscaping code changes, debates specimen-tree thresholds and buffer rules
Summary
The Land Development Regulation Commission approved several landscaping and buffer revisions and agreed to return definitions and tree-protection sections to a workshop. The board added a 1.25-to-1 credit for preserved native habitat and asked staff to add arborists to certification language.
The Marion County LDRC approved a package of landscaping and buffer changes and directed staff to refine remaining tree-protection and definition language at a follow-up workshop.
Jim Couillard, the county’s landscape architect, walked the commission through four definition amendments and multiple changes to landscaping standards. Commissioners debated specimen-tree diameter thresholds — one commissioner warned that setting a baseline at 36 inches could incentivize clear-cutting to avoid constraints, while staff argued that a 36-inch threshold for specified species (live oaks, magnolias, longleaf pines) would protect meaningful, character-bearing trees. “If we set it as low as 36 inches, I do believe that all sites are going to go through the full clearing method and clear their entire site and not save anything,” the chair warned; Couillard and others responded that species-specific categorization and mitigation language are better approaches.
The commission agreed to a modest incentive for preservation: preserved native habitat that meets criteria will receive a 1.25-to-1 credit (a 25% bonus) toward landscaped-area requirements for nonresidential projects. Commissioners also addressed front-yard and replacement-tree credit, buffer-sharing language, shrub and tree sizing for buffers (discussion of minimum 7-gallon shrubs and minimum heights), and maintenance-certification frequency. On certification, the LDRC directed staff to broaden the pool of eligible certifiers and add arborists to the list of responsible design professionals authorized to sign required buffer integrity reports. The commission also debated whether the certifier could be the maintenance contractor; a public commenter suggested certification should not be done by the same entity that maintains the landscaping; commissioners clarified that certifiers and maintainers should be distinct where accountability could be compromised.
The board approved sending the landscaping package to the Board of County Commissioners with the modifications agreed at the workshop and continued the linked definitions and tree-protection sections (items 2.3 and 2.5) to a March 25 workshop to allow staff to refine the language further.
