Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Restraint Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subcommittee refers revised restraint, timeout and seclusion policy after DESE rule changes
Summary
Following DESE updates, the subcommittee reviewed a revised policy that separates timeout and seclusion, clarifies prerequisites for seclusion (parent consent, licensed mental health and medical clearance, principal approval), monitoring, and reporting; members voted to refer the policy to the full committee for July consideration.
Get email alerts on the Restraint Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fall River Public Schools Policy Subcommittee voted June 10 to refer a revised restraint, timeout and seclusion policy to the full committee after a presentation on changes in the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education regulations (603 CMR 46) that take effect Aug. 17.
Jim, the district’s chief compliance officer, summarized the central changes: the regulations now define "timeout" as a voluntary behavioral support strategy that a student may elect to end, while "seclusion" is any involuntary confinement in a room or area from which a student is not permitted to leave. New prerequisites for seclusion include documentation from a licensed mental health professional and a licensed physician indicating no contraindications, written parental consent, and principal approval. The regulations also require continuous observation, safe facilities, immediate reporting, and regular reviews of incidents and schoolwide data.
"If you close the door and the student wants to leave and you don't let them, that's considered seclusion," Jim said, stressing the need for written consents and careful documentation. He noted that principals must be notified the same school working day and parents must be contacted within 24 hours, and that schools must maintain logs and conduct weekly and monthly reviews for patterns.
Committee members expressed concerns about staff and student safety, the availability of licensed professionals for sign‑offs, and implementation details. Members urged separating policy from procedure (policy concise; procedures as a reference document) and requested more training for staff on de‑escalation strategies and how to classify incidents under the new definitions.
On a roll call the subcommittee voted to refer the revised policy to the full committee with a recommendation to address training, documentation, and procedural clarity. The referral means the policy will be considered by the full committee in July ahead of the DESE effective date.
No new forms of restraint were added by the subcommittee; the referral will allow the full committee to consider final language and required district procedures before implementation.

