Board debates attic/FAR guidance, executive‑session logistics and limits on public‑comment time
Members asked Development Services for more information about an attic/FAR decision, discussed a more streamlined executive‑session process for hybrid hearings, and tasked legal staff with advising on possible limits to public‑comment time and the practice of donating speaking time.
The full story
Board members spent a substantial portion of the meeting on internal procedure and policy discussions, focusing on three areas: clarifying Development Services’ guidance after a recent attic/FAR ruling, reworking logistics for mid‑hearing executive sessions in a hybrid meeting environment, and considering changes to rules limiting public‑comment time and the donation of speaking time.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in