Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Wise County Board approves CDBG application, ordinance, appointments and interim administrator pay
Summary
At its recent meeting the Wise County Board of Supervisors approved a CDBG application for Riverview, an ordinance to round cash payments, a revenue-sharing agreement, the reappointment of Jackie Johnson, and compensation for interim county administrator Karen Mullins.
Get email alerts on the Government Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Wise County Board of Supervisors adopted a series of routine measures during its meeting, approving motions and resolutions on grant applications, ordinances, appointments and interim staffing compensation.
Key votes recorded in the meeting transcript:
• Community Development Block Grant application (Riverview water-line replacement): Approved (see separate article for details).
• Ordinance to round cash payments to the nearest five cents: The board held a public hearing and adopted the ordinance; the measure applies to cash transactions only as described during the hearing.
• Revenue-sharing agreement: The board approved a resolution to enter a revenue-sharing agreement (details of counterpart and exact monetary figures were not specified in the transcript).
• Reappointment of Jackie Johnson: The board moved and seconded a motion to reappoint Jackie Johnson to the planning district commission identified in the record as the 'Winiscoco Planning District Commission'; the motion passed by voice vote.
• Compensation for interim county administrator Karen Mullins: The board approved compensation of $2,500 per month for service as interim county administrator from January through June and authorized $5,700 per month going forward until a full-time administrator is hired, with a limit up to six months noted in the motion.
• Certification of closed session: The board approved a resolution certifying that only public business properly exempted under the law was discussed in the closed meeting.
Most measures were adopted by voice vote; the transcript does not record detailed roll-call tallies or named roll-call votes. Where the record does not provide specifics (for example, exact revenue-sharing dollar amounts or the formal name of some partner entities), the article notes that the details were not specified in the meeting record.

