Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adus And Udc Changes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts state-mandated ADU and development-code changes after staff briefing
Summary
Cabot City Council on Dec. 1 adopted a package of Unified Development Code amendments — including state-mandated rules for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) — after staff explained the changes stem from recent state acts that limit local discretion. Several councilmembers expressed frustration at the state-driven requirements.
The Cabot City Council adopted a set of amendments to the city’s Unified Development Code on Dec. 1 that implement recent state legislation affecting accessory dwelling units (ADUs), site-plan review and related definitions.
After a work-session briefing from staff, council members voted to waive additional readings and approve Ordinances 33, 34, 35, 36 and 37, which update procedures, buffer/fence requirements, ADU rules, the table of permitted uses and definitions (including child-care facility definitions). Ben, a city staff member who summarized the package, said the ADU language and many definitions come verbatim from state statute and that the planning commission will be bound by the state requirements beginning Jan. 1. He described the shift as “heavy-handed driven by the state on this thing,” and urged residents with concerns to contact state legislators.
The measures address several discrete topics: Ordinance 33 (UDC 4.8.3) requires that all site plans submitted to the city go to the planning commission and be resolved on a 30–45 day schedule; Ordinance 34 (UDC 5.4.6) adds a requirement that commercial and multifamily developments abutting single-family lots install an opaque privacy fence; Ordinance 35 (UDC 4.17) updates standards tied to state language; Ordinance 36 (UDC 4.6) updates the table of permitted uses to add ADUs (with a staff clarification that ADUs are allowed only on lots that already contain a single-family structure); and Ordinance 37 (UDC 6.1.2) revises definitions, including distinct definitions for child-care centers and home daycares and the ADU definition.
Council discussion during the work session focused heavily on ADUs. Laura, a city staff member who walked council through the redline changes, said the city is limited in how it may regulate ADUs because the act’s definitions and provisions are binding. Councilmembers pressed staff on lot-coverage limits, the possibility of variances, and concerns that allowing ADUs broadly could increase the rental population. One council member warned the change could create a “wild wild west” if local controls are loosened.
Council action at the regular meeting included suspending second and third readings and then adopting the ordinances by roll-call vote. The transcript records affirmative roll-call votes for Ordinances 33, 34, 36 and 37. Ordinance 35 passed after a recorded roll call that included both affirmative and negative votes; the council’s transcript lists individual yea/nay responses and records the item as adopted.
Why this matters: The ADU changes alter how the city treats single-family lots and remove some local discretion in favor of statutory definitions and timelines imposed by the state. Staff emphasized that, while the city must implement the statute, residents can seek changes at the state level.
The council did not take final action on a separate rezoning request (Ordinance 38) at the Dec. 1 meeting; that item remains on the council’s docket for future consideration.
