Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Term Limits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Term-limits proposal prompts mixed reaction from Everett committee
Summary
A proposal to add three-term limits (with a four-year gap to return) for mayor and council drew mixed reactions: proponents said limits encourage turnover and diversity; others worried about optics if current officials would be prevented from running and suggested delaying or separate consideration.
The committee examined a charter amendment proposal to add term limits for councilmembers and the mayor — three consecutive full terms with a required four-year gap before returning — and heard differing views on timing and optics.
Jennifer Gregerson outlined the draft language and noted it would be added to the packet for council consideration. A councilmember asked directly whether passage would prevent the current mayor from running again; the response given was "Right," confirming that sitting officials could be affected if voters approve the change. Members who favored term limits argued limits can open seats and encourage more competition; members who opposed said adopting limits now while certain incumbents serve could appear targeted and suggested delaying the proposal or handling it separately.
Gregerson said the commission reviewed charters from other charter cities (Port Angeles, Spokane, Tacoma) and noted the county model was similar in some respects. The committee did not vote; staff will prepare draft language for council readings if the council elects to proceed.
