Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Engineering Consulting Rfp topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

St. Lawrence County records multiple proposals for engineering consulting and demolition work under RFP 2020-6-24

St. Lawrence County · June 25, 2026

Summary

The county recorded proposals from several firms for RFP 2020-6-24 (professional engineering consulting services for new buildings and alternate demolition). Proposals and demo line items ranged from about $22,000 to $61,187 for demolition; LaBella was noted to have missing paperwork that the firm said it would submit.

St. Lawrence County fiscal officer Stephanie Kerr recorded proposals submitted in response to RFP 2020-6-24, which solicits professional engineering consulting services for the county's new buildings facility and alternate demolition work.

Kerr read proposals from CNS Companies (overall $284,070; demolition $22,900), LaBella (overall $299,000; demolition $37,360) — for which Kerr noted a missing signature on section five and that a representative named Corey said he would submit the non-collusion page and addendum — CT Mail Associates (overall $376,300; demolition $22,000), Barton & Loguidice (overall $325,000; demolition $47,000) and Mock Architecture (overall $342,195; demolition $61,187). Kerr confirmed that most proposals included signed non-collusion pages and addenda; she specifically flagged the LaBella paperwork as pending.

At one point near the close of the item a numeric line — "Theirs is overall 208 even" — appears in the record without a clearly associated proposer name; the transcript does not identify which firm that figure refers to. Kerr closed the item after recording submissions and paperwork and invited questions, noting that the county would follow up on missing documentation. No awards or selections were made during the session.

Procurement staff will perform the formal evaluation, verify paperwork and follow county procurement rules before any contract is recommended or executed.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source