Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oronoco commission hears project updates; staff cites code on driveway permits and notes ongoing code enforcement
Summary
Staff reported active projects near Casey's and Peoples Energy, said some developments are awaiting council action and zoning finalization, and reminded commissioners that city code section 94.20 generally allows one driveway per residential lot and requires a variance for an additional driveway; a code-enforcement case at a Mary Nash property may go to council.
Commissioners received an update on local development and permitting activity and discussed several enforcement and permit-rule items.
Staff said several projects are advancing: three lots near Casey's have been sold and are expected to move forward in spring, LDM Electric and other minor applicants continue through the process, and the Peoples Energy parcel north of the former site remains pending council approval before work can proceed. A condo project referred to as the CIC/Dragons development on the city’s east side was also noted as awaiting final zoning actions before further work begins.
Commissioners discussed a drain-field parcel designated as green space; staff said it remains unclear whether redevelopment is possible and that the item requires further follow-up with city staff to determine options under the current designation.
On code enforcement, the commission addressed an ongoing case at a property owned by Mary Nash. Staff reported stepped-up enforcement actions, notices posted and that council may be asked to consider further action if compliance is not achieved.
On driveway rules, Evan, a staff member, said he had checked the municipal code and that “section 94.20 is in your code about driveway permits and you're allowed up to one [driveway] when you're residential. Any additional driveways, you have to request a variance from the city.” Commissioners noted a nearby right-turn lane and intersection geometry could complicate approval of a second driveway, and they said no formal permit application had yet been submitted for that lot.
The commission deferred final decisions on fees, variances and some pending applications until staff can present formal permit applications or get clearer answers from county/state agencies on specific development constraints.
