Get email alerts on the Rpi Invoice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Coolidge staff seeks itemized justification for $46,083.75 RPI repair bill
Summary
City Manager Lonnie Adamson requested that vendor RPI provide an itemized invoice to justify a $46,083.75 repair charge; the city will evaluate whether SPLOST funds can be used and pursue dispute resolution or alternate contractors if RPI does not respond.
City of Coolidge staff asked vendor RPI to produce an itemized invoice to justify a $46,083.75 repair bill, the workshop minutes show.
City Manager Lonnie Adamson told the council staff will request detailed line items from RPI so the city can determine which portions, if any, qualify as maintenance and therefore could be funded with SPLOST (Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax) proceeds. If RPI complies, staff will then coordinate payment and the use of SPLOST funds for eligible costs. If RPI does not respond, the city plans to pursue resolution on the disputed charges and explore alternative contractors to complete the work.
The minutes do not record a formal vote or a motion; they describe staff direction to seek additional documentation and, depending on the vendor response, to pursue dispute resolution or other contractors. The notes do not specify which department performed the repairs, the contract under which work was done, or a deadline for RPI to respond.
Next steps recorded in the minutes: staff will request the itemized invoice from RPI, assess SPLOST eligibility for maintenance versus upgrades, and report back to council with a recommendation.
The workshop did not identify a formal timeline for payment or dispute actions beyond the request for an itemized invoice.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
