Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Coastal Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer, engineer and attorney argue exceptions for work inside 30‑foot setback at 17 Atlantic Ave
Summary
At its July 1 session the commission heard revised plans, mitigation and a legal memo for 17 Atlantic Ave; the commission closed the hearing after agreeing conditions that require native plantings, demarcation and multi‑season monitoring.
Representatives for a proposed raise‑and‑rebuild at 17 Atlantic Avenue presented revised plans, a mitigation package and an innovative alternative septic system aimed at reducing nitrogen loading to the nearby salt marsh. Engineer Zach Waczynski said the project reduces overall impervious coverage on the lot and adds roughly 300 square feet of mitigation plantings in the lower property to enhance the coastal buffer.
Attorney Tyler Franklin submitted a written legal memorandum and told the commission his reading of the regulations allows limited exceptions and waivers to the town’s 30‑foot no‑activity zone for redevelopment and where the project provides a net environmental benefit. Franklin said, “There are exceptions and exemptions underneath the regulations...In my opinion, that’s not the case [that there’s an absolute prohibition].” Commissioners probed whether the project is largely within the prior footprint, how access and utilities are defined in the exemption language and whether proposed mitigation and erosion controls sufficiently protect resource areas.
Commissioners asked for and received commitments on erosion control, a demarcated mitigation area, and native coastal plantings to be submitted for staff approval. Staff emphasized that the mitigation area shall be monitored for multiple growing seasons and that plantings must reach an 80% survival target or be replaced. The board closed the hearing and adopted the recommended conditions with the plantings, demarcation and monitoring requirements to be enforced via the order of conditions. The decision records the legal memo in the project file but conditions focus on enforceable mitigation and monitoring measures.
This matter illustrates how the commission balances local no‑activity standards with case‑specific demonstrations of net benefit and prior footprints. The applicant must provide a final planting list and an as‑built certification to staff before clearing the mitigation area to begin work.
