Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners split on Industrial Development Board picks amid procedural debate
Summary
Commissioners debated substitute motions and procedural steps while appointing two members to the Industrial Development Board; substitute motions, seconding and chair tie-breakers determined final appointees.
A procedural dispute over substitute motions and voting rules marked the commissioners' discussion of Industrial Development Board appointments.
Commissioner Burch nominated Ken Johnson to retain his seat on the board. Commissioner Charles offered a substitute motion to replace Johnson with Tim G, which drew a second from a commissioner representing Tim G's district. Commissioners engaged county attorney Thompson on whether the substitute motion had been fully voted on or whether an additional vote to enact the substituted motion was required.
After additional nominations and substitute motions—including a later substitute to place Ben Moltry on the board—the chairman cast tie-breaking decisions and the commission filled both available seats, with the transcript recording motions, seconds and the chairman's tie-breaking vote but not a detailed roll-call tally for each appointment.
County attorney Thompson advised that commissioners could adjourn to executive session to discuss applicants' character and qualifications if appropriate under open-meetings laws. The commission declined to move that discussion into closed session at this time.
The transcript shows the appointments were made through motions, substitute motions and tie-breaking votes; commissioners discussed using a work session for applicant review and the county administrator will document the process.
