Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Housing task force presents county survey data, urges planning for future growth
Summary
Co-chairs John Drew and Sean Milne summarized a county housing task force report and voluntary survey showing steady population growth in Box Elder County and strong local preference for development near town centers; presenters said full citations and slides will be shared with the city.
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
John Drew, co‑chair of a county housing task force, told Tremonton residents at a public forum that the group has spent three years studying local housing supply, public attitudes and policy recommendations. "We've come a long way since then," Drew said, describing an award‑winning report the task force updated and shared across larger cities in the county.
The presentation, prepared by Sean Milne and the task force, highlighted steady population growth in Box Elder County and survey responses collected through a voluntary, statewide initiative called Guiding Good Growth. Milne said the survey was self‑selected and countywide, and he offered to make the presentation, sources and citations available to attendees after the meeting.
Why it matters: presenters framed the work as forward‑looking guidance for local planning, arguing that without accommodating future residents the community risks making long‑term investments that leave younger generations unable to afford to live locally. Drew said the task force included elected officials, Utah State University faculty and staff, developers, church leaders, realtors and financial institutions, and that the group used town halls to gather community input.
The presenters described four development patterns used in the survey: (1) allowing new housing primarily on the edges of communities, (2) allowing mostly edge development but including housing near transit and town centers, (3) focusing new housing near transit and town centers and in appropriate areas near existing neighborhoods (higher density), and (4) restricting development to slow growth. Milne said responses favored patterns that included development near town centers and transit rather than limiting new housing to community edges.
Drew and Milne cautioned the survey’s voluntary design limits its statistical representativeness to the entire county, but they said it reflected local sentiment and illustrated tradeoffs residents consider when weighing growth and neighborhood change. Milne emphasized that detailed citations and the slide deck would be shared on request.
The forum did not adopt any regulation or policy at the meeting; presenters characterized the session as informational and said next steps would involve city and county planning processes where specific land‑use and impact‑fee studies would be required.

