Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit Issues topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit of draft article vs. transcript
Summary
Checklist-based audit flags a small set of issues for correction before finalizing the article: transcript concatenation error, lack of detail for some consent items, and timeline boundary labeling in highlights.
Spelling: Found concatenated names in the attendance line in the transcript ("Bobbi LemerondJeana Winslow"); corrected to separate names in speaker list and article. Severity: low.
Clarity: The minutes list the Safety Plan and policy PDFs in the packet but do not transcribe their content; the article must not state omitted details as facts. Severity: medium.
Chronology: Timeline and article preserve the sequence of adjourn-to-closed-session motions and the reconvened open session at 5:30 p.m. No chronology issues. Severity: none.
Framing: The article must avoid implying any controversy or content from closed sessions. The draft correctly records that closed-session content was not disclosed. Severity: none.
Misinformation: No factual contradictions between minutes and article text were identified beyond the concatenated attendance error. Severity: low.
Misidentification: No speaker was misidentified with a role the transcript did not provide; Alfred Pyatskowit is listed as Board Clerk per the signature. Severity: none.
Out_of_context: The draft avoided lifting claims from closed session; community comment content was not invented. Severity: none.
Quantitative precision: Voucher and revenue figures are quoted exactly as recorded in the minutes. Severity: none.
Process clarity: The draft differentiates discussion (Superintendent's report) vs. decisions (motions/votes). Severity: none.
Agency clarity: The article names the Shawano School District and references the Wisconsin statute correctly. Severity: none.
Question emphasis: No Q&A exchanges in the minutes to misrepresent. Severity: none.
Omission: The minutes do not provide details of personnel actions or the substance of the Safety Plan; the article notes that details are in the packet and does not claim otherwise. Severity: low.
Bias: The draft is neutral and fact-focused. Severity: none.
Duplicate: No duplicative passages identified. Severity: none.
Transcript Segment Error: Some highlight entries used placeholder segment ranges (e.g., SEG 0640–0710) that do not exist in the transcript; these have been flagged and will be corrected to existing SEG references. Severity: medium.
